Old Testament and Cannabis Chapter 11 Christian Ethics and Cannabis Use Chapter 12 Matthew Stolick reviews the science and medicine but goes further in explicating the folly and futility of using the law to punish users of this drug by carefully exploring how the fields of philosophy, religion and ethics further inform the issue. His powerful treatment of the subject leaves little doubt that the long-standing prohibition of marijuana is an anachronistic and harmful absurdity.
The philosophical arguments advanced are quite thought-provoking in their examination of cannabis policy. To ask other readers questions about Otherwise Law-Abiding Citizens , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about Otherwise Law-Abiding Citizens. Lists with This Book.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Community Reviews. Showing Rating details. All Languages. More filters. Sort order.
Otherwise Law Abiding Citizens: A Scientific And Moral Assessment Of Cannabis Use
Michelle rated it really liked it Mar 30, Amanda Repreza rated it it was amazing Aug 20, Iyanajess rated it it was ok Sep 13, Donny rated it it was amazing Jul 14, Preston marked it as to-read Nov 21, Lafayette Cates marked it as to-read Sep 11, However, it is not possible to expect identical results if replicated in the UK, given the wide variety of cultural and historical factors that can influence drug use and especially problem drug use.
Areas of development This paper represents a step forward in our understanding of drug harms but is by no means the definitive answer. Repetition of the MCDA process with other relevant groups such as police, teachers, doctors, politicians, users and in other countries would help to build a fuller picture of the range of harms.
Taking into account the various benefits of drugs would also enable better understanding of why people take drugs and how they might positively impact on users and society. It is not yet possible to say how harmful mephedrone is given the lack of evidence. However, by legislating on a substance without reliable, scientifically-based evidence, we run the risk of causing more harm through criminalising users than might be caused by the drug itself. The evidence on drug harms should not be sacrificed for political and media pressure, especially given recent research by Sheila Bird positing that a drop in cocaine deaths in was due to users switching to mephedrone.
A minimum data set, specifying what needs to be known about a substance in order to deal with it effectively, through legislation or otherwise, is urgently needed, at both the domestic and international level. The event was held under Chatham House Rule to enable participants to speak their minds freely, however, we will be publishing outputs from the event as soon as possible.
In the meantime, the full paper is available to read for free on the Lancet website. I welcome your feedback. However, by legislating on a substance without reliable scientifically-based evidence, we run the risk of causing more harm through criminalising users than might be caused by the drug itself. The evidence on drug harms should not be sacrificed for political and media pressure.
My last blog on how to reduce the damage caused by alcohol consumption received more responses than any other to date.
Work commitments have prevented me from responding until now — the below is a collated response to comments made by contributors. I have also updated the alcohol post with added references.
- Otherwise Law-Abiding Citizens : Matt Stolick : !
- | David Nutt's Blog: Evidence not Exaggeration;
- 7.1. Deviance and Control.
- Pin on Rebranding Pot (Articles);
- Otherwise Law-Abiding Citizens?
A: The data on drinking and associated violence is not as clearcut as that — Police say violence has increased Q2. A: However, as far as I am aware, wherever the limit has been lowered then lives are saved Q3. Indeed, as I said, some of the ciders are not even brewed they are synthetic combinations of alcohol and flavouring.
They are something adults can enjoy without needing to use to excess. A: That why we need new policies to change the trend! Alcohol related harms have increased as prices have decreased due to higher consumption. A: But all their livers will have been more harmed than if you had bought them a smaller glassful.
Otherwise Law Abiding Citizens: A Scientific And Moral Assessment Of Cannabis Use 2008
Many experienced drinkers say they prefer the taste of alcohol-containing drinks because they are conditioned to them by the effects of the alcohol they contained. Indeed if alcohol free drinks were all that were available, I suspect most of us would be quite happy to drink them in preference to water or other alcohol-free alternatives. A: Not true — in part we drink because we are subconsciously conditioned to drink by the alcohol in drinks. A: Private organisations can do what they want but not with a taxpayer subsidy via the university. I think what you mean is you want it to be make it as expensive as it was in the s relative to income.
No thanks. An average drinker would save much more in terms of reduced health and policing costs than they would lose in extra taxation. A: Agreed — this would only work if other outlets also closed earlier or completely. A: Many of the poor are poor because they are addicted to alcohol and tobacco — tobacco price increases have helped reduce demand so why not for alcohol?
A: Agreed, a cost-benefit analysis is required for all drugs legal and illegal. A: This may be due to some teetotallers being ill. The health benefits of alcohol are not proven — see Academy of Medical Science. Okay so we have a few thousand binge drinkers, but we have laws to deal with them. They can be arrested for their behaviour. London: House of Commons; Report No.
If someone chooses to spend their life smoking, having a beer and hates taking exercise that about sums me up then let them.